{"id":725,"date":"2022-08-30T16:20:12","date_gmt":"2022-08-30T16:20:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/?page_id=725"},"modified":"2025-09-05T23:52:23","modified_gmt":"2025-09-05T23:52:23","slug":"anna-akhmatova","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/authors\/anna-akhmatova\/","title":{"rendered":"Anna Akhmatova"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Anna Akhmatova, The Unconquerable Voice: Poetry as an Act of Defiance and Witness<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Anna Akhmatova <\/strong>was not just a poet; she was the living memory of a nation. Born in 1889, she came of age during the “Silver Age” of Russian poetry, a period of immense artistic and intellectual flourishing. But her life, and her art, would be defined by the brutal tragedies that followed: the Revolution, the Civil War, and the horrific purges of the Stalinist era. While many of her contemporaries were silenced, fled into exile, or perished in the gulags, Akhmatova stayed. She chose to be a witness, a keeper of the memory of her people’s suffering. Her poetry, once the elegant, personal verse of a young love poet, became a testament to an entire nation’s pain. It was a quiet, unyielding voice that refused to be silenced, a stone in the river of history that stood firm against the current. She is remembered as a symbol of defiance, a literary conscience who proved that even in the face of absolute terror, the human spirit and a poet\u2019s voice can remain unconquered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

A Life in the Crucible of Revolution and Terror<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

To understand the immense power of Akhmatova’s work, you must first understand the life that forged it. It was a life that began in a time of artistic optimism and ended in a period of unimaginable despair.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Poet’s Belle \u00c9poque: The Silver Age of Russian Poetry<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova was born Anna Gorenko, but she adopted the name Akhmatova from her Tartar grandmother to distinguish herself from her family. She began writing poetry in her youth, finding her place among the vibrant and experimental poets of the Silver Age. This was a time of creative liberation, where poets and artists were experimenting with new forms and new ideas, creating a rich cultural tapestry in St. Petersburg, a city she would forever be associated with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A St. Petersburg Debut and the Acmeist Movement<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Her early work was lyrical and intimate, focusing on the nuances of love, relationships, and daily life. It was a direct contrast to the grand, mystical themes of the Symbolists who preceded her. Akhmatova, along with fellow poet Osip Mandelstam, became a leading figure in the Acmeist<\/strong> movement, which advocated for clarity, simplicity, and a direct, tangible connection to the world. Her collection, Evening<\/em><\/strong>, published in 1912, established her reputation as a major new voice, a poet of personal truth and emotional precision. .<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A World Collapsed: War, Revolution, and a New Reality<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The peaceful world of the Silver Age came crashing down with the outbreak of World War I, the Revolution of 1917, and the brutal Civil War that followed. The artistic circles Akhmatova knew were shattered. Poets and writers were exiled, imprisoned, or executed. Her own husband, the poet Nikolai Gumilyov, was executed by the Bolsheviks in 1921. Her world was transformed from one of aesthetic debate to one of stark, brutal survival.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Poet’s Choice: To Stay or to Flee<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

As the terror mounted, Akhmatova was faced with a choice. Many of her friends and colleagues fled to the West, becoming \u00e9migr\u00e9s who continued their creative lives in Paris, Berlin, and London. Akhmatova, however, chose to stay. She famously refused to leave her homeland. She saw it as a moral and spiritual duty to remain in Russia, to suffer with her people, and to be a witness to their fate. Her decision to stay was an act of profound courage, and it would define not only her life but the very nature of her later work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The Akhmatova Style: A Lyrical Voice Forged in Iron<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

As her world changed, so too did her poetry. It lost its early innocence and gained a new, devastating power. Her lyrical style, once so delicate, became a tool for historical memory and political defiance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Power of a Quiet Voice<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova’s later poetry is remarkable for its restraint. She never raised her voice in a political scream. Instead, she spoke in a quiet, controlled tone, allowing the sheer weight of the tragedy she was describing to do the work. Her poems are filled with a sense of dignity and gravitas. She found a way to express the inexpressible the fear, the loss, the waiting not through bombast but through a simple, unyielding focus on the truth of the moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Personal and the Universal<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova had an incredible ability to take a personal tragedy and make it universal. She wrote about her own suffering, her own losses, and her own loneliness, but in a way that resonated with the collective experience of millions of Russians. Her pain became a mirror for their pain. She was the one who could give voice to what others were too terrified to speak. She understood that a single, honest voice could be more powerful than a thousand pieces of propaganda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Poetics of Memory and Loss<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Memory is a central theme in Akhmatova’s work. She was a keeper of the past, a chronicler of a lost world. Her poems are filled with ghosts ghosts of friends who were executed, ghosts of a city that was no longer the same, and ghosts of a love that was destroyed by the revolution. She used poetry to combat the state’s attempts to erase history and rewrite the past. Her art was an act of remembrance, a refusal to let the state decide what was true.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Enduring Power of a Single Detail<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova’s genius lies in her use of concrete, vivid details to convey immense emotion. She could describe a single object a crumpled piece of paper, a cracked window and imbue it with the weight of a nation\u2019s suffering. For example, in her later poems, the image of a key in a frozen pocket speaks volumes about the cold, isolating fear of the Stalinist purges. Her work is a testament to the idea that sometimes, the most powerful truths are found not in grand pronouncements but in the smallest, most overlooked details of a broken life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Requiem: The Masterpiece of Witness<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Her most famous work, Requiem<\/em><\/strong>, is not a single poem but a cycle of poems that she wrote in secret over many years, starting in the late 1930s. It is her great masterpiece and one of the most powerful poetic testaments to suffering ever written.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Poem of a Nation’s Suffering<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Requiem<\/em><\/strong> is Akhmatova’s response to the Great Terror, the period of purges and mass arrests in the Soviet Union. The poem is a series of vignettes, each one a stark, honest account of her personal experience during that time. She wrote about the fear, the long queues outside the prisons, the uncertainty, and the quiet despair of waiting for news of loved ones who had disappeared. The poem was not published in Russia until 1989, more than twenty years after her death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Great Terror and the Queue Outside the Prison<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The poem’s opening lines immediately plunge the reader into the heart of the terror: she describes the endless queues of women waiting outside the prison, each one hoping to get a glimpse of a son, a husband, or a brother. Akhmatova became one of these women herself, as her own son, Lev Gumilyov, was arrested and sent to the gulag. The poem is a raw, unflinching account of the shared suffering of these women. .<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Mother’s Pain and a Country’s Grief<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The central thread of the poem is Akhmatova’s pain as a mother. She describes the agony of a mother who has lost her son to the state’s violence. Her personal grief becomes a metaphor for a nation’s collective grief. The poem is a powerful lament, a cry from the heart that is both deeply personal and profoundly universal. It is a work of immense courage, written at a time when even speaking of such things could lead to one’s death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Private Sorrow as Public Testimony<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Requiem<\/em><\/strong> is more than just a poem; it’s a historical document. By putting her private sorrow on paper, Akhmatova gave a voice to the millions of people whose suffering had been erased from official history. The poem became a form of public testimony, a witness to the truth of the Stalinist era that the state desperately tried to deny. It’s a prime example of the power of art to preserve memory in the face of tyranny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova’s Enduring Legacy<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova’s life and work left an indelible mark on Russian literature and the world. Her legacy is one of unwavering integrity and artistic courage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Voice That Refused to Be Silenced<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Despite being censored for decades, Akhmatova continued to write, memorizing her poems and sharing them with a trusted circle of friends. She knew her words were too dangerous to be written down, so she carried them in her mind, like a sacred trust. This act of memorization and oral transmission is a powerful testament to her unwavering commitment to her art and her refusal to let the state silence her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Burden of a Literary Conscience<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova was a moral and literary conscience for a generation of Russian writers. She served as a link to the great tradition of Russian literature that had been all but destroyed by the revolution. She was a mentor to younger poets and a living symbol of artistic integrity. Her very existence was a rebuke to the official propaganda and the artistic compromises of the Soviet era.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Impact on Russian and World Literature<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova’s influence on Russian literature is immense. She is considered one of the greatest poets of the 20th century, a master of the lyrical voice. Her work has been translated into dozens of languages, and she is revered by poets and readers around the world. Her poetic legacy is a powerful testament to the idea that a poet’s duty is not to the state, but to the truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Symbol of Human Resilience<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Ultimately, Akhmatova is a symbol of human resilience. She was a woman who lost her husband to execution, her son to the gulag, and her artistic freedom to censorship. Yet, through it all, she never stopped writing. She found a way to turn her pain into art, and in doing so, she created a legacy that is not just about suffering, but about the unconquerable spirit of a soul that refused to be defeated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Conclusion: A Stone That Lives<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Anna Akhmatova was a poet who lived through a century of storms, and her poetry became a stone in the river of history. It is a stone that is unyielding, permanent, and filled with a quiet, living truth. She was not a political figure or a revolutionary firebrand. She was simply a poet who chose to remain in her homeland and to bear witness to its pain. In a world that demanded conformity and silence, her quiet, honest voice was an act of profound rebellion. Her legacy is a reminder that art can be a powerful force for truth and memory, and that even in the face of the greatest tyranny, a single, unconquerable human voice can endure and, ultimately, outlive its oppressors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

1. What was the “Silver Age” of Russian poetry?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The “Silver Age” was a period of intense and brilliant artistic and intellectual activity in Russia, spanning from the late 19th century to the early 20th century. It was a time of experimentation and new movements in poetry, art, and philosophy, in which Akhmatova was a central figure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Why did Akhmatova refuse to leave Russia?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Akhmatova famously refused to leave Russia, despite the immense danger she faced. She felt it was her moral and spiritual duty to stay in her homeland, to suffer with her people, and to be a witness to the suffering and tragedy of the Stalinist era.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. What is the significance of the poem “Requiem”?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requiem<\/em><\/strong> is Akhmatova’s most famous and powerful work. It is a cycle of poems that serves as a poetic testament to the suffering of the victims of the Great Terror under Stalin. The poem is significant for its emotional honesty, its raw portrayal of a mother’s grief, and its role as a historical document that memorializes those who were silenced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. How did the Soviet government punish Akhmatova for her poetry?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Soviet government did not publish Akhmatova’s poetry for decades. She was a “non-person” in official circles, and her work was banned. Her son was repeatedly arrested and sent to the gulag, and her friends and colleagues were persecuted, all of which was a form of political and personal punishment for her artistic independence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. What is the Acmeist movement?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Acmeist movement was a poetic movement in early 20th-century Russia, which included Akhmatova and Osip Mandelstam. It was a reaction against the Symbolist movement, and its followers advocated for clarity, precision, and a focus on concrete images and the tangible world, rather than abstract, mystical concepts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Maxim<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Maxim Gorky<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"Boris<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Boris Pasternak<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Alexander<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Alexander Pushkin<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"Ivan<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ivan Turgenev<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Anna Akhmatova, The Unconquerable Voice: Poetry as an Act of Defiance and Witness Anna Akhmatova was not just a poet; she was the living memory of a nation. Born in 1889, she came of age during the “Silver Age” of Russian poetry, a period of immense artistic and intellectual flourishing. But her life, and her art, would be defined by the brutal tragedies that followed: the Revolution, the Civil War, and the horrific purges of the Stalinist era. While many of her contemporaries were silenced, fled into exile, or perished in the gulags, Akhmatova stayed. She chose to be a witness, a keeper of the memory of her people’s suffering. Her poetry, once the elegant, personal verse of a young love poet, became a testament to an entire nation’s pain. It was a quiet, unyielding voice that refused to be silenced, a stone in the river of history that stood firm against the current. She is remembered as a symbol of defiance, a literary conscience who proved that even in the face of absolute terror, the human spirit and a poet\u2019s voice can remain unconquered. A Life in the Crucible of Revolution and Terror To understand the immense power of Akhmatova’s work, you must first understand the life that forged it. It was a life that began in a time of artistic optimism and ended in a period of unimaginable despair. The Poet’s Belle \u00c9poque: The Silver Age of Russian Poetry Akhmatova was born Anna Gorenko, but she adopted the name Akhmatova from her Tartar grandmother to distinguish herself from her family. She began writing poetry in her youth, finding her place among the vibrant and experimental poets of the Silver Age. This was a time of creative liberation, where poets and artists were experimenting with new forms and new ideas, creating a rich cultural tapestry in St. Petersburg, a city she would forever be associated with. A St. Petersburg Debut and the Acmeist Movement Her early work was lyrical and intimate, focusing on the nuances of love, relationships, and daily life. It was a direct contrast to the grand, mystical themes of the Symbolists who preceded her. Akhmatova, along with fellow poet Osip Mandelstam, became a leading figure in the Acmeist movement, which advocated for clarity, simplicity, and a direct, tangible connection to the world. Her collection, Evening, published in 1912, established her reputation as a major new voice, a poet of personal truth and emotional precision. . A World Collapsed: War, Revolution, and a New Reality The peaceful world of the Silver Age came crashing down with the outbreak of World War I, the Revolution of 1917, and the brutal Civil War that followed. The artistic circles Akhmatova knew were shattered. Poets and writers were exiled, imprisoned, or executed. Her own husband, the poet Nikolai Gumilyov, was executed by the Bolsheviks in 1921. Her world was transformed from one of aesthetic debate to one of stark, brutal survival. The Poet’s Choice: To Stay or to Flee As the terror mounted, Akhmatova was faced with a choice. Many of her friends and colleagues fled to the West, becoming \u00e9migr\u00e9s who continued their creative lives in Paris, Berlin, and London. Akhmatova, however, chose to stay. She famously refused to leave her homeland. She saw it as a moral and spiritual duty to remain in Russia, to suffer with her people, and to be a witness to their fate. Her decision to stay was an act of profound courage, and it would define not only her life but the very nature of her later work. The Akhmatova Style: A Lyrical Voice Forged in Iron As her world changed, so too did her poetry. It lost its early innocence and gained a new, devastating power. Her lyrical style, once so delicate, became a tool for historical memory and political defiance. The Power of a Quiet Voice Akhmatova’s later poetry is remarkable for its restraint. She never raised her voice in a political scream. Instead, she spoke in a quiet, controlled tone, allowing the sheer weight of the tragedy she was describing to do the work. Her poems are filled with a sense of dignity and gravitas. She found a way to express the inexpressible the fear, the loss, the waiting not through bombast but through a simple, unyielding focus on the truth of the moment. The Personal and the Universal Akhmatova had an incredible ability to take a personal tragedy and make it universal. She wrote about her own suffering, her own losses, and her own loneliness, but in a way that resonated with the collective experience of millions of Russians. Her pain became a mirror for their pain. She was the one who could give voice to what others were too terrified to speak. She understood that a single, honest voice could be more powerful than a thousand pieces of propaganda. The Poetics of Memory and Loss Memory is a central theme in Akhmatova’s work. She was a keeper of the past, a chronicler of a lost world. Her poems are filled with ghosts ghosts of friends who were executed, ghosts of a city that was no longer the same, and ghosts of a love that was destroyed by the revolution. She used poetry to combat the state’s attempts to erase history and rewrite the past. Her art was an act of remembrance, a refusal to let the state decide what was true. The Enduring Power of a Single Detail Akhmatova’s genius lies in her use of concrete, vivid details to convey immense emotion. She could describe a single object a crumpled piece of paper, a cracked window and imbue it with the weight of a nation\u2019s suffering. For example, in her later poems, the image of a key in a frozen pocket speaks volumes about the cold, isolating fear of the Stalinist purges. Her work is a testament to the idea that sometimes, the most powerful truths are found not in grand pronouncements but in the smallest, most overlooked details of a broken life. Requiem: The Masterpiece of Witness Her most famous work, Requiem, is not a single poem but a cycle of poems that she wrote in secret over many years, starting in the late 1930s. It is her great masterpiece and one of the most powerful poetic testaments to suffering ever written. The Poem of a Nation’s Suffering Requiem is Akhmatova’s response to the Great Terror, the period of purges and mass arrests in the Soviet Union. The poem is a series of vignettes, each one a stark, honest account of her personal experience during that time. She wrote about the fear, the long queues outside the prisons, the uncertainty, and the quiet despair of waiting for news of loved ones who had disappeared. The poem was not published in Russia until 1989, more than twenty years after her death. The Great Terror and the Queue Outside the Prison The poem’s opening lines immediately plunge the reader into the heart of the terror: she describes the endless queues of women waiting outside the prison, each one hoping to get a glimpse of a son, a husband, or a brother. Akhmatova became one of these women herself, as her own son, Lev Gumilyov, was arrested and sent to the gulag. The poem is a raw, unflinching account of the shared suffering of these women. . A Mother’s Pain and a Country’s Grief The central thread of the poem is Akhmatova’s pain as a mother. She describes the agony of a mother who has lost her son to the state’s violence. Her personal grief becomes a metaphor for a nation’s collective grief. The poem is a powerful lament, a cry from the heart that is both deeply personal and profoundly universal. It is a work of immense courage, written at a time when even speaking of such things could lead to one’s death. The Private Sorrow as Public Testimony Requiem is more than just a poem; it’s a historical document. By putting her private sorrow on paper, Akhmatova gave a voice to the millions of people whose suffering had been erased from official history. The poem became a form of public testimony, a witness to the truth of the Stalinist era that the state desperately tried to deny. It’s a prime example of the power of art to preserve memory in the face of tyranny. Akhmatova’s Enduring Legacy Akhmatova’s life and work left an indelible mark on Russian literature and the world. Her legacy is one of unwavering integrity and artistic courage. A Voice That Refused to Be Silenced Despite being censored for decades, Akhmatova continued to write, memorizing her poems and sharing them with a trusted circle of friends. She knew her words were too dangerous to be written down, so she carried them in her mind, like a sacred trust. This act of memorization and oral transmission is a powerful testament to her unwavering commitment to her art and her refusal to let the state silence her. The Burden of a Literary Conscience Akhmatova was a moral and literary conscience for a generation of Russian writers. She served as a link to the great tradition of Russian literature that had been all but destroyed by the revolution. She was a mentor to younger poets and a living symbol of artistic integrity. Her very existence was a rebuke to the official propaganda and the artistic compromises of the Soviet era. The Impact on Russian and World Literature Akhmatova’s influence on Russian literature is immense. She is considered one of the greatest poets of the 20th century, a master of the lyrical voice. Her work has been translated into dozens of languages, and she is revered by poets and readers around the world. Her poetic legacy is a powerful testament to the idea that a poet’s duty is not to the state, but to the truth. A Symbol of Human Resilience Ultimately, Akhmatova is a symbol of human resilience. She was a woman who lost her husband to execution, her son to the gulag, and her artistic freedom to censorship. Yet, through it all, she never stopped writing. She found a way to turn her pain into art, and in doing so, she created a legacy that is not just about suffering, but about the unconquerable spirit of a soul that refused to be defeated. Conclusion: A Stone That Lives Anna Akhmatova was a poet who lived through a century of storms, and her poetry became a stone in the river of history. It is a stone that is unyielding, permanent, and filled with a quiet, living truth. She was not a political figure or a revolutionary firebrand. She was simply a poet who chose to remain in her homeland and to bear witness to its pain. In a world that demanded conformity and silence, her quiet, honest voice was an act of profound rebellion. Her legacy is a reminder that art can be a powerful force for truth and memory, and that even in the face of the greatest tyranny, a single, unconquerable human voice can endure and, ultimately, outlive its oppressors. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What was the “Silver Age” of Russian poetry? The “Silver Age” was a period of intense and brilliant artistic and intellectual activity in Russia, spanning from the late 19th century to the early 20th century. It was a time of experimentation and new movements in poetry, art, and philosophy, in which Akhmatova was a central figure. 2. Why did Akhmatova refuse to leave Russia? Akhmatova famously refused to leave Russia, despite the immense danger she faced. She felt it was her moral and spiritual duty to stay in her homeland, to suffer with her people, and to be a witness to the suffering and tragedy of the Stalinist era. 3. What is the significance of the poem “Requiem”? Requiem is Akhmatova’s most famous and powerful work. It is a cycle of poems that serves as a poetic testament to the suffering of…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":726,"parent":27,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-725","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=725"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/725\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1282,"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/725\/revisions\/1282"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/27"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/726"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/russlink.ir\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}